"Zahir, in Arabic, means visible, present, incapable of going unnoticed"-Faubourg Saint-Peres, Encyclopedia of the Fantastic 1953
May 17, 2014
Welcome! Sdravstuvyte! Bonjour! As-salam alaykom! Ni hao! Selamat!
My name is Polina. Discussing politics can be a drag, a bore, and even frustrating. To make it clear, I am not here to put out "I'm right you are wrong" or "if I believe it then it must be true for everyone else" type of attitude. I believe we have enough of that in the world for me to be yet another person who doesn't want to be open minded, understanding, and rational. This site is a dedication to not only being tolerant, but wanting to learn, express, and appreciate the differences that we all have to offer to each other. Tolerance doesn't mean respect. It simply means that you are able to put up with the person enough to not despise them. Being welcoming and understanding others is entirely different. This site will be factual, posing hypothetical questions or rhetorical ones, or my take on any given situation. You are more than welcome to send emails and I will respond back answering or reflecting on any given comment within my next post. Posts will be done on weekly basis.
My first topic concerns nuclear power. The news has recently discussed how talks with Iran have ended in set backs. Throughout my studies I have come to the conclusion that despite the nuclear bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, our world doesn't seem to have learned it's lesson fully. What is the point of continuing harvesting or developing stronger nuclear power if we all know that nobody wants it to be used against humans? Unless of course we do have someone evil enough to want to actually utilize that power in the next war. We have seen the dire consequences, so why do we keep on posing threats between countries of making new missiles, new bombs, etc? If that power would be used as a means of energy for our use in daily lives, that would be an entirely different issue. Instead of electricity, if a city loses all of its power, we would use nuclear power as means of light, what then?
Recently, I had a conversation with a friend of mine about North Korea. The main question I asked myself and my friend was even though it is a dictatorship, is it beneficial for the people to an extent that they are secluded and live in their own world apart from the rest of humanity? The media, internet, even the news about other countries is all controlled by Kim Jong-un. Yes their freedom is taken away, yes their daily life is constantly monitored, but are there benefits to living in a secluded society to the extent that at least you aren't brainwashed or have to deal with the issues that the rest of us have to face? Of course one could argue that they are brainwashed by their government as well, so what's the difference? From a positive point of view, I see that there are benefits to not having to deal with typical pressures that the rest of the world deals with. At the same time it's fascinating to see that Kim Jong-un constantly threatens using nuclear power and conducts tests that are on the border of South Korea. It all seems to tie down to the concept of attention. While he is the supreme leader for his country and controls everything, stating the country wants to be left alone to itself, yet he constantly makes headlines with threats, missile tests, etc. This shows that he is still human and regardless of what he might want his people to believe, in reality his actions clearly indicate that being secluded isn't what he really wants.
Switching to more of a business type of thinking, I decided to touch base about taxes. One of the observations I've noted to myself is that you see either someone winning a lottery, or stars splurging on huge purchases for houses, cars, etc. and then not ever paying taxes or having the money to do so. Number one rule when it comes to expensive purchases, be able to afford the taxes that follow it. If you purchase a $3 million dollar home, how do you not think ahead of the property taxes that house will have on it? That always intrigues me when I read in the news that some celebrity is now filing for bankruptcy because they have no money and owe thousands if not millions in back taxes. Don't purchase assets that you can't afford taxes on, that's all there is to it. In addition, if you win a lot of money or make it big with NBA players, movie stars, etc. it doesn't mean that all of that money has to be spent to show off how expensive something is. It's easier to spend it all right away and then be broke then to spend some or make smart purchases, but keep the rest or invest it.
This week I wanted to talk about huge corporations. Studying everything from Wal-Mart, Exxon, to Enron and BP, a lot of people have a very negative outlook about such corporations and their conduct. There is no argument that with each one of the mentioned companies there were tremendous scandals that has tarnished their image. However, one question I'd pose to the public would be if there were no huge corporations would the US economy have thrived or grown to the size and power it has if those corporations wouldn't exist at all? It's easy to sit and discuss everything bad that all of them have done to the country, but let's say for the hypothetical purpose they would not ever exist, what then? Would the United States economy have emerged as one of the top in the world, or would it just be full of small businesses struggling to survive in a capitalistic market? It's important to not forget that there are always two sides to any argument, and while it might not eliminate or justify that the negative actions are right, it also shouldn't erase the fact that it is because of such corporations that business in general has evolved to what it is now. It is true that corporations have been given a lot of power, and it continues to grow, but isn't it also true that it is due to the people who are in the government that pass measures which in turn increase that power in the first place. While numerous legislation has been passed to enforce tougher penalties, increasing tougher penalties does not mean that acts such as cheating, lying, and stealing can be entirely eliminated. People will be people, whether good or bad.
The World Cup is on! What a wonderful and amazing sport soccer is! I actually used to play it myself way back in elementary school. I've always admired and thought it was interesting that despite all the conflict that rages on in the world, when it comes to such events as the Olympics, regardless of whether they are Summer or Winter ones, people stop and entirely forget their differences and enjoy the event for what it is. The only Olympics that actually had to be put on hold were in 1937 and 1940 due to WWII. There is still something to be said about the topic though. I find it strange that if we as humans are able to come together and support each other in such events as sports, then how is it politics wise we are unable to sit down and have a rational discussion? Yes, everyone comes from different cultures, backgrounds, beliefs, etc. but if we all forget about the differences for these events, then how is it that we can't or don't even wish to comprehend the other persons' point of view for more serious matters? It's hard to believe that out on the field because it's such a big event everyone is solely focused on the game. As soon as the World Cup will end though, for countries that are in conflict among each other, they will return to the same state once more. I hope that one day we won't need to have just sporting events to be able to accept each other regardless of faith, culture, and languages.
What makes a business successful? Is it outstanding customer service? Is it leading marketing tools? Is it the type of the service the business provides? No single business can do every segment perfectly and be on top without having to worry about competitors. Thus, to me a successful business is one that focuses on several or few segments it can be a leader and progress in those. It is a business that knows not only its strengths, but also weaknesses. A business that keeps up to date with its competitors not just within one particular segment, but the entire industry as a whole. A lot of mistakes are made because of overconfidence and having the attitude that once there is a stable profit coming in, nothing else really would shake or alter that could cause losses. It is important to remember that there can always be someone better, more efficient, and stronger business that could overtake yours. This thought shouldn't be a constant fear, but a reality check that when things are going well, it is important to not forget that unless you are prepared to see competition, then it won't be a shock if something does occur. No one can predict the future one hundred percent, but to be able to have several key scenarios in mind, keeps you on your toes, and makes your business not just more efficient, but also aware and prepared. Given that in today's world there are millions of businesses, unless you have an edge over your competitors, then you will get trampled down really fast.
Studying immigration, and having a personal experience with this subject, there seems to be a lot of hypocrisy about this in the United States. The nation is known for being a "melting pot", full of different cultures, religions, beliefs, music. etc. It just doesn't seem right when people are ignorant and don't even acknowledge that at some point even their ancestors were immigrants. There has been a big debate going on about immigration and protecting the US border, however, I am amazed that most "Americans" don't even realize or stop to think how this country even came to be. It is not like there was one group of people centuries ago and that's it. Englishmen came to a land that was filled with various tribes of Indians. Throughout the 19th and 20th centuries thousands of immigrants migrated to the United States. There were even specific time frames or decades where it was solely groups of Germans, Polish, and Europeans, and then Chinese, Vietnamese, and others. So to me to see that instead of studying how much of an impact immigrants make on society, for "pure Americans" to criticize and have such a negative outlook on immigrants only shows hypocrisy, ignorance, and who knows maybe even jealousy. I understand we don't have to like every single person we meet, but there is a difference between acknowledging that you simply don't want to really talk with someone, versus being blandly rude or even discriminate solely because someone is from a different culture. Should we now deport those who have any roots of immigrants dating back to 1900s? That would be ridiculous, so why would the sole solution to the issue now be: deportation?
Since the day that Edward Snowden had released a lot of information about NASA collecting data from US citizens, I'm sure a lot of us have been even more skeptical about the information that we are asked to provide. Regardless of whether it is in an email, on some type of a form, or even on the phone, I personally have always been very skeptical about giving out personal information to someone that I don't find credible. I also see that in regards to Snowden himself there is a fine line between national security and putting the entire country at risk ,versus being transparent with its own citizens. Where do we draw that line is hard to say. I do believe that when it comes to certain facts, information, etc. there is a reason why top officials have clearance for it and every other person doesn't. The average public wouldn't know what to do with all that information, and in addition it's not for the faint of heart to just give out everything right and left. Some things are really not meant to be known by every citizen, regardless of what country you live in. At the same time, to hide or to collect data on citizens without them really aware of it is crossing the boundaries of privacy. Where do we draw the line of how much is too much? Some might argue that as long as the country is safe, then they would be willing to provide personal information, after all they "have nothing to hide", while others argue that it is a breach of privacy. This question doesn't even seem to have a right or a wrong answer, at least not in my eyes.
Israel and Palestine have been fighting against each other for centuries. What amazes me is that even in today's more modern world, and with civilization growing so much, we still have people that are so engulfed in their own culture they do not wish to understand or compromise with anyone else. There is a difference between disagreeing and acknowledging that the opinions or stances on certain situations won't change, but you "agree to disagree". And then there is the willing to kill, die, and sacrifice everything the country and the people have as long as the point is proven. Life doesn't seem to matter nor is there a reason to think that being rational is somehow a legitimate solution. It does become harder however, when the conflict is over where to draw a border for a physical location of a country. At the same time, again, regardless of the issue, we all should be able to find a compromise that does not involve death. So even if the issue is where to draw boundaries between countries, at some point there needs to be a way of dividing the territory that does not involve slaughtering of people. This isn't 2nd or 3rd century where people only were developing skills. We all could do much better than fighting physically. That is the most easiest way of handling any type of conflict.
I decided to take a break from writing on here for a while. Seeing that a lot of issues have arisen throughout this month. The first thought that comes to my head is the concept of guns and humans. Despite the different rights that each country possesses when it comes to firearms, I find it absolutely ridiculous that parents do not teach their children the actual and potential dangers of guns. It doesn't matter how old you are, but the fact that while one country has parents worried about having kids that bring guns to schools, the other one is fighting a war where kids of the same age are using weapons just to protect their villages. It all depends on the situation/circumstance of the country. Even if the laws are different, the notion of what the weapon does to another human being is an entirely different concept.It is sad to see that not enough people teach each other let alone their kids that this isn't a toy. AGAIN, GUNS are not toys just to "play round." Somehow, the public doesn't grasp that. It seems that just by simply having an argument over the entire issue is enough to "shortly convince" some that they are. However, what does it accomplish in the long run? As humans we will always have our differences, but to be willing to kill each other over those differences is what ultimately should be the main concern. Not just the regulations over the arms, but why do we as humans feel the need to kill each other over opinions, over territory, over anything? Yes, territory is crucial, yes even animals fight over it..but we aren't animals..we are given a brain and intelligence that animals don't posses specifically because we have reasoning to be able to think through our decisions. Yet, how does us killing each other over the same things over and over again make us any different from animals?
When it comes to doing business in different countries every country has it's own regulations, laws, etc. It is only when you begin to conduct business within a certain area or region that you realize what obstacles lie within it. Even though some countries might be welcoming for tourists, when it comes to business, they can be much more harsh and stubborn to deal with. For example, since US does not support or engages in bribery, meanwhile most countries overseas do, how do you go about establishing a business/opening a new office abroad without having to pay bribes? It is easy to sit here and state that simply by not paying the money that is all there is to it, however such is not the case. Let's say Company A wants to open a new location in Latin America, specifically in Argentina. (Note, this an example and is not meant to portray this country in any mean way). It so happens that in order to push the paperwork to the top of the list, or to get any approved signatures Argentinian officials demand an extra $1,000 to be included in the cost of the fees for the paperwork. As US officials/company, this would be considered a bribe. However, this no longer is a matter of simply we shouldn't pay the bribe. Without this fee, the paperwork not only won't be pushed through, but the chances of it being even looked at could take up to 5 years. Company A does not have 5 years, it only has one year as its maximum time frame to have this paperwork completed. What should Company A do? It is situations like these that make it much more complicated and cause us to stop and think how DO we conduct ourselves on an international level? And it all stemmed from one simple issue of paying a fee for paperwork that any given company needed to complete in order to expand overseas. Bribery is only one example of how conducting business is not so simple as it might seem from the first glance.
It has been a while since I've written on here yet again. There are several conversations that are in the news lately about businesses and international politics. For the most part everyone is concerned about the Ebola virus outbreak. What is the government doing to ensure our safety and what is the realistic threat it possesses? Well, for starters the media does a wonderful job of ensuring that the public is in a panic and never ceasing worry about the virus. Then there is the very intelligent move on the government's part to not leave those who have contracted the virus over seas, over seas, but instead bring them back to the United States therefore providing a better guarantee that the virus will spread, and treat the patients in the US. That doesn't sound sketchy at all..If you think about it, why would any smart and common sense person want to bring the patient here, if there is talk about isolating the virus and ensuring it doesn't spread around the world? Wouldn't it make more sense to quarantine the infected person wherever they are, not allow them to travel back home and treat them at the location they were diagnosed/discovered to be sick? No, of course not, that would be too easy and too rational. It makes me beg the question what is the real issue at hand/what is the realistic plan behind all of this? Just to draw the focus away from what is really happening in the world or another move that is part of a bigger agenda? Most of the issues that occur could be solved with a more realistic and no nonsense approach, however, that does not happen very often. It is important to understand that the virus isn't a joke, it has caused deaths, however, before any of us continue to "panic" we should be weary and do our own research on the details of it all.
As much controversy as there has been over abuse of power, I can't help but think where do we draw the line of governance? What is too much power and what is medium amount or balanced? A part of this entails what I find intriguing in the balance of power within the United States Constitution and democracy. Sure the triangle between the three branches might seem confusing, but to create such a concept takes a lot more than just intelligence. It takes concept of justice, of free will, of balance and by balance I mean true balance, unshakable desire for freedom and equality for a group of men to write up a document so detailed and yet so vague at the same time that it can still be of use 200 years later. So while we sit and "judge"or speculate about who is abusing power today, maybe we should stop and think how even over a century ago there was a legal document that was created that can still govern us today. Maybe our solution to balancing power isn't about restricting it entirely, but finding a balance for the rest of the world to function, regardless of culture, language, and history. Think about it, if we were to come up with different variations or one that would work for all the rest of the countries to govern, and it would satisfy the world, then how different would our planet be? This is of course, idealistic, but at the same time no other country has come up with a government system that would be able to progress from century to century and still be one of the best systems for the modern world. There are a lot of types of government that might be great on paper, but in reality once implemented would destroy any hope of equality. Democracy, however, and the way that the Constitution was written has been able to achieve that.
Unless I write otherwise, this might be the last post of this year.I have to say that despite all the ridiculous news, most of the public would find it surprising that Gone With the Wind movie main character Scarlett was actually English. While it might be not the typical topic to discuss, it is also quite intriguing. The movie was filmed during WWII using English actors, and yet it is a story about the American Civil War. How ironic, and yet the producer was so set on Vivien Leigeh that he did not disclose who the true actress of the character was until the very last minute, knowing there would be controversy. This brings me to the point of us following our dreams. Despite the international conflict, Victor Fleming didn't cease his search for the perfect actress. It took him over two years by the way. And at the very last minute, he found the most astonishing actress, who wasn't even local! If this scream "I DON'T CARE, I WILL PICK ANY PERSON WHO SUITES THE ROLE, REGARDLESS OF THE BACKGROUND" then I don't know what else does. One of the most famous movies in the industry, and yet how few know about this detail. So the next time someone decides to talk negative about someone being from a various background, just bring up an example of this, let alone a producer who is willing to take a risk and go beyond nationality, but actual talent. Which by the way, does not entail years of school will make someone an expert. You can study all you want to, and still not be the right fit. Heritage does not mean that you are guaranteed a job. Remember that next time you bring up that issue as your "card".
February 23, 2015
I know I haven't written on here for a while, but happy new year to everyone! Wal-Mart recently announced that they are increasing the minimum wage from $7.50 to $9/$10 an hour. Thousands of Americans have been waiting for this news for years, and those who have been leading protests in regards to this matter can now breathe a sigh of relief. However, the discussion of minimum wage is far from being over. The one key concept that a lot of people tend to miss is that cost of living and inflation have also risen throughout the years. This is a basic concept of economics. We simply can't continue to live our daily lives without acknowledging that our economy is not what it was forty to fifty years ago. Although I have heard a few comparisons of gas dropping lower to what it might have been back in the 1960's and 1970's, the issue still stands. While from a corporations' perspective it is in their best interest to continue saving money, cutting cost, and paying the lowest wages they are able to, it is also irrational to believe that this tactic will last. It had to happen at some point, and it finally did. The cost of living doesn't just fluctuate throughout the years, but also within the country itself. The average price for an apartment on the east coast, is not the same as the average price in the south or even on the west coast. That is simply another part of economics. Thus, for any business to believe that they can continue to function without adjusting to the current economic standards is simply foolish. It didn't work post the Great Depression and it won't work today. There is a reason why there specific coined terms in economics such as GDP, CPI, and even GNP. For those who are not familiar with such terms, you can look it up online, but the point is that these terms don't simply exist just for "fun." It also proves that as we continue evolving, so do our economies. Without adjusting to the changes that surround us, we simply are failing to learn from the past and move into the future.
Although some of my posts have been more rare, the international community still continues to have news everyday. With the new Apple IWatch releasing soon, and having almost a million pre-orders that have been made I have had several discussions with my friends about technology. The company's history is known well to many, a competitor of Microsoft and with little promise for a future, it has grown to be a huge publicly traded corporation today. What sparks my curiosity is that despite the watch running on an 18-hour charge, not 24 hours that are in a day, people are still desperate to buy it. The marketing campaign that Apple has put in place has worked its magic. Yes, while we do not use a watch 24 hours because realistically we would take it off for various reasons, including sleep, where we aren't awake for those hours, the argument of it not running for 24 hours is plausible. However, I find the fact that people are flocking to buy it that badly a bit odd. The watch can run the same/similar apps that an Iphone has, and would use smaller amount of memory, thus making the applications more efficient. It would also be able to store music, sync to your car, and other devices. However, because those of us who have had an Iphone know how fast the charge begins to die as we begin to charge the phone more frequently, my argument with the Iwatch is the same. Once a person begins to charge it more frequently, and let's say the phone dies in middle of the day or in the morning post waking up, how inconvenient would that be for that person. Additionally, I am certain with newer versions the charging chords would also become different, thus demanding customers to buy a separate charging device for the watch. To me it just defeats the purpose of what a watch stands for. Unless the battery does die, which in regular watches does not happen that often; once it does begin to deteriorate you notice the time displayed begins to become inaccurate; then the Iwatch is just the next "it" thing that the company has worked on developing to cater to its customers. It isn't an entirely brand new concept if you really think about it. Combining the power of a watch and a smart phone. It simply is the next step of our technology progressing. At the same time, you do have to applaud Apple for jumping at the chance and being the first company that uses this new development to its advantage. Without a doubt when it comes to global companies they have been around long enough to adjust to the market demands accordingly.
(One year anniversary!)
The recent Philadelphia train derailment that happened on May 12, which as of currently left 7 people dead and over 150 injured made me question not just the safety of the railroad system in the US, but also the concept of care of humanity as a whole. While the engineer is still under investigation, I ask myself there are numerous other factors that play a role in the collision apart from the driver. For instance, in what condition were the rails themselves? As of the latest information, they recently are lacking in repair and upkeep...which makes me question as to why on earth would the railroad commission or anyone in charge of maintenance not ensure that at any given point and time the rails are replaced and fixed if needed to be...at some point we have to stop pointing fingers at every other person and take responsibility for our own actions and wrong doings..thus, if there numerous factors at play in this situation, and there are plenty of people that made up excuses instead of doing their job and ensuring that the entire rail system is safe...in that case it is not solely the engineers fault. Yes, the man should not have been going double the speed limit especially on a such a steep curve, and given he isn't in a car, but a train, he should know better, however, at this point I would also have to ask why do we as humans become so careless about our jobs that we forget that in certain positions we carry so much responsibility for others? This isn't some cartoon where when Bugs Bunny gets shot, he'll get up again and run away...in reality, when people die, they die. There is no second life...and that to me is just what makes me wonder, we all have our faults, we all can be careless, but as long as you are responsible for other peoples' lives as part of your job and duty, at no point and time should it become some type of a joke. If there is some tragedy going on in the employee's life, maintain some type of a communication system with your coworkers or boss to be able to express that you are not able to carry out your duties at 100% capacity. Don't be silent or just pretend that nothing is wrong or you can "go through it" and not be effected by something. It is better to let others know and take a day or two or even a week off, rather than risk something so tragic happen.
At this point I'm certain that the FIFA scandal has reached most of the world enough to be able know vaguely what is going on with the organization. For one I didn't find the news to be something extremely shocking. Some of the allegations/corruption issues have been surfacing throughout the years are not that much of a revelation. Other concepts, such as who gets to host the World Cup, at some point and time we should realize money will be a big factor whether we would like to admit to it or not. To me, having to study business on an international level, which includes studying of how to do business/start a business in any given country and the corruption index around the world, is something I should predict and thoroughly understand. The main point I would emphasize is one being aware of different culture standards and regulations, and additionally, not just knowing the laws, but understanding of how regular business is conducted in any given country. What seems to be the norm for one, might be the most offensive action in another. Does that mean that we should stand by and allow it to continue? Certainly not. However, I have seen it first hand that to fight an entire system is not as easy as it might seem from an outside perspective. The sad truth about money and power is that in the end it seems to rule regardless of how good we might strive to be. I hope that each one of us wishes that at some point we will come together and be able to curb corruption, but the reality and truth about us as humans is that we will always have the downfall of wanting more. In this particular example it means having more money and power. Regardless of how much we wish for others to understand be satisfied with having what they do, overall we won't ever be able to control or teach EVERY SINGLE person on the planet to realize that, and work on being happy with what we have. We can certainly strive to be better, by no means should that ever stop, but at the same time we should be able to understand what realistically goes on in the world.
Recently, as I talked to an acquaintance of mine about my interests, passions, etc. it dawned on me that unless we follow specific interests and continue to grow and educating ourselves, we end up being stuck in an endless circle, or just "dumbing down" to everyone else's standards. For me to be able to share my experiences and allow others to learn from them, is what makes the world a better place. However, if we don't share our knowledge with others and just let it "sit in ourselves" what is the point? Since I have such a unique background, I continue following international news and business issues. However, an average American unless is well traveled, has a varied family background, or friends, doesn't follow any of that. That is the reality of it all. Sadly, that is why unless as a society we learn to be accepting of intelligence and awareness of other cultures, beliefs, etc. nothing else will change. It is refreshing when I talk to someone and although they might not know much about a certain culture or concept, they also have no problem being honest and asking questions if they don't understand something. Being judgmental and commenting on how horrible someone or something is can always be done in a split second. It is much harder to have a rational debate or conversation with actually attempting or wanting to understand the issue. That is why I hope that my readers not only keep up with a variety of news and interests but actually do learn to be more open minded and accepting. As far as where the news and facts come from, that is an entirely different issue. The main point I want to make and emphasize is it absolutely alright to acknowledge we don't know something and want to learn more about it. And it is absolutely wonderful to meet new people and become friends with them when you see they are just as open and wanting to expand their knowledge instead of simply making an inaccurate judgment. Maybe that is something that as a society as a whole we should strive towards.
Studying the crisis that is going on in Greece it definitely becomes a very complex issue at the core of the argument. My main thought about all of this is should the EU be lenient and allow exceptions for not even Greece, but let's say any country that wants to enter into the union, or should it stick strictly to the regulations it has written? The troubled started when Greece was failing meet it's financial standards to be accepted into the EU. The union members and the board decided to extend/alter/tweak the minimum requirements in order for Greece to join. Although it wasn't a big difference, they did lower the standards just so that Greece would barely pass the mark. What does this teach other countries? Let alone, while the immediate affect might be something worth to "celebrate for" in the long scheme of things this only paves the way for more problems. As time went on, Greece devalued its currency to curb the debt that it acquired. The problem with this is, that means that you are adjusting the value to fit the current needs, not really taking into account that the market will not stay the same, people still need to continue living their day to day lives, and concepts such as trade and taxes don't just disappear into thin air. From one side Greece took a plausible approach to solve the problem. From the other side, however, economists/ government officials that understood what they were doing, should have been able to forsee at least top 5 outcomes in the long term as a result of this. The other interesting concept that stands out is that since the EU is the only zone that uses the same currency, the rate of inflation, prices, cost of living, etc are all varied from one country to the next are also eliminated or pretend to be of no importance in what are the basic concepts of economics.
A girlfriend of mine just recently returned from a trip to France she took to visit another mutual friend of ours. Discussing the trip and the French culture got me thinking that it's hard to fully grasp the differences between cultures unless you are physically around it. Despite the fact that I have studied various cultures, I learned some new things about France, and it's nice to be able to have those in depth conversations with your friends. I do find that what might be perceived as weird or unusual in one culture is very typical or the norm in another. At the same time, while we were discussing some of the things she found a tad strange, I thought to myself what about common sense and just thinking with your head regardless of what culture you are in? I do believe that some things shouldn't be taken as an insult or even a cultural concept, but rather it makes logical sense and thus should be a common sense type of concept. For example, if someone is thirsty they'd drink some water, let's say that a particular culture doesn't typically have water sitting on the table in restaurants. Does that mean that if you notice a person has a glass of water, that all of sudden you would find it an insult to your culture or appalling that they have it sitting on the table? At what point do we use our heads and see that maybe this person is very parched or they might need to drink water for medical reasons and thus it shouldn't matter what the culture perceives it to be. That is just one example, there are thousands of such things that I can list, but I hope that this example proves the point. While I respect that various cultures have different understandings and norms, we are also human, not robots, and should be able to understand that not everything is cultural. Some things are simply what makes us human. If it makes life easier, than why should it be just a cultural concept? Yet it is strange that there are so many of these type of scenarios that would be considered an insult to those that still while grasping the issue would disagree and say we don't do that. Hopefully as our generations continue evolving, we will start using our brains more so than relying on beliefs.
Although I typically don't post mid-week, i decided that since several new issues have been in the news, it's very plausible to write. Iran and the United States just came to an agreement about nuclear powers. Recall my first post when I started this site I discussed about nuclear power and its potential. Obama came on a TV show that is ending in a couple weeks called The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, on which they did talk about the recent deal as well as how the media has been portraying it. First of all, Obama mentioned how diplomacy does work, and entirely eliminating the nuclear arms would not work with Iran officials. Secondly, he stated that in order for the public to understand what is going on, they need to study the topics well enough to gain all the knowledge of the situation. Both points are good, however, it begs the question what on earth would realistically happen if those bombs were set off? Despite the compromise, i hardly doubt that anyone in the world would honestly wish to have our planet destroyed to the bone. I agree that diplomacy works, and clearly there is a reason why there is a concept of international relations, however, does not mean that everyone thinks on the same page and is willing to budge even on the most serious issues.This is what we all should come to the terms with, that unless we look at issues such as nuclear power as something from a general point of view, humanity, not really arguing over culture, background, etc. but life itself, then the world will know how to compromise.
Over the weekend, I met someone who teaches a course in International Finance, specifically in the energy industry focusing on investments. This person has recently traveled to Vietnam, which you don't hear much discussion about these days. It got me thinking, how little we pay attention to countries that used to play such a big role in history. It's amazing that Vietnam went from being scrutinized and trash talked to having it's own stock exchange. Yes, to other's shock and disbelief they do have that now. My thought of the week is one why is it that as humans in general, and as much as we have advanced we don't share knowledge as much as we could? We have yet to reach our full potential. And given that what's in the past is in the past, and times have changed, it amazes me that some countries are in the news 24/7, while others are hardly mentioned, when in reality they are the ones who we really should be discussing. Does it matter whether it was a negative or a positive historical issue? At this point, it really should not. By no means am i discrediting that, but we should be able to look past the history, and accept that even those countries that were once our enemies are now either our allies, or are competition given the resources and the advantages they possess. That is what we should be discussing, not some rumor or petty detail that in a big scheme of things really doesn't matter at all. And the second thought i had was really we should start including these countries in our textbooks for our children to learn and continue progressing. If not now then when? If we don't do it, then someone else will.
With some of the tragic news about shootings, i decided to talk about the 2nd Amendment in the U.S. Constitution. Having studied it, I understand why it exists, but what i believe most people refuse to acknowledge and understand is that just becuase you have the right to do something doesn't mean you absolutely should. The 2nd Amendment was written specifically because during the British invasion, the soldiers would not only take over towns, but abuse wives, children, and the husbands would not be able to protect their own families. That is the major reason why the right to bear arms came into existence. To be able to protect your land and loved ones without having to be imprisoned for doing so. However, fast foward to our time, and instead of using our brains to the best of our abilities we have dumbed down to thinking that simply because the Constitution allows it, everyone needs to have a gun. No you don't. This fascination with guns is beyond any rational thinking. Tell me, what other country has any similar type of a government and the public wants to go to bars, restaurants, and movie theatres and show off their guns? If you really think about it, where in Europe, or Asia or South America do you see people just dyinig to have documents/permits to carry a gun, and go to bars and show it off to everyone? That is something that i really sincerely hope that the next generations wil grow up and consider seriously. Doesn't mean that the right needs to be eliminated, because that is always the first conclusion someone who gets offended jumps to. "Oh, so you want to get rid of the 2nd Amendment?" No...no one is saying that is what needs to happen. But common sense is out the door when it comes to grasping as to why you even have that provision in the first place. Before anyone decides to point fingers, just think about what it has done to the country, and asnwer the question of this fascination towards it, before continuing on with any other details.
These last couple of weeks have been interesting. Talking to several of my friends, I thought about a few general ideas. This doesn't necessarily fall under business or international relations, but rather humanity as a whole. I recently met a very interesting woman, who has traveled to several different countries, lived in Germany for ten years or so, and has had quite some adventures to say the least. I thought about how without travel and without learning about other cultures, traditions, etc. life and people become mundane and boring to us. That is why we should strive to never stop growing and learning. It was very refreshing to talk to someone who is well traveled, open minded, and intriguing. Those are the type of people we need more of in this world. Talking to her was such a joy and entertaining. It is not only just the education, it's also the experiences that changes your perspective about life and that is why such people are really interesting. Broadening our horizons shouldn't be something we need to reiterate, it should be like second nature to us. Afer all civilizations have emerged, grown, and fallen all becuase of striving for progress. That is my short but good point for this week.
This week the second presidential debate for the Republican candidates was held for the United States. Amidst all the issues that were discussed, i found it interesting that for once a lot of the comments/platforms were very rational. Sure there were some moments of arguing back and forth and circling around an issue, but for the most part, this was one of the most rational and well presented debates. I thought to myself that if we all would be able to set aside our emotions, and just put yourself in that persons' shoes, you would understand where it is that they are coming from. Given the background of each and everyone of them, the proposed plans/platforms that they discussed made sense. To me it seems that it's so easy for all the rest of the nation to sit and judge and comment on whether they agree or disagree. However, how many of us actually know the economic terms that were discussed? Or how many of us actually understand what would happen if taxes would be eliminated in one sector but raised in another? These are the questions that we should think about, not the bickering of "I can't believe he just said that"...it doesn't matter what someone says, at the end of it all, the country will want to see actual results/actions taken, not just words spoken. But in the meantime, it doesn't hurt anyone to contiue learning more about what can actually be done to solve the issues presented.
This week I want to talk about euthanasia. A very tough subject for all cultures, regardless of what anyone states. I've actually had to discuss this subject in class before, and let me say this, that no matter what anyone states that they "know" what decision they'll make, they don't! You ask me, or anyone making that statement as to why, let me say this, do any of us know what will happen if a gun is put to our head? Did any of the American's know what they'd be asked in Oregon? For those of you who don't know, look it up, I'm sure Google will provide enough information for you. As far as I'm concerned, this is a "test of a lifetime" that not a single person will AND I WILL REPERAT, THIS, EVER BE ABLE TO ANSWER THE QUESTION TO, UNLESS YOU ACTUALLY ARE HAVING TO FACE THE SITUATION! And the reason I put this in caps, is because, every single person on earth will be quiet, when they sit and think about making a decision about pulling a plug on their brother, father, mother, grandparent, friend. etc. anyone that you consider close to yourself, and have the audacity to come and say that it is "easy" or "you know exactly" what you would do, unless you have actually have had to face it. Until we have faced a certain/specific situation, we won't ever "know" what it means. So regardless of what country, culture, religion, etc. all I ask is really?! Either you are a human being or you are not, and by that I mean you either accept that we will have differences and we will have very hard decisions to make, or you really do believe we aren't human, because one, we do make mistakes, and two, if you don't accept that we will disagree on certain decisions then you don't deserve to talk. People who can't and WILL NOT accept different opinions are the ones who should think twice about what it is they are saying.
Over the weekend I had an interesting conversation with a newer acquitenance of mine about different cultures and view of thinking about life. It occurred to me that while some people might think that it's relatively easy to converse with someone from a different background, it is not so. Unless you have studied a vast amount about how each culture differs or resembles another one, diversity of religions, foods, and traditions, then it is harder to grasp as to how one statement can impact/offend another culture. To me it shows disrespect and lack of open mindedness if you are not willing to at least want to understand why a person might think one way over another. Or what exactly is it/what lies at the root of it that offends that person/culture. When we come to accept that not every view point will be right versus wrong, then the world will be an entirely different place. Its not just who is right and who is wrong, it is also about gaining understanding and appreciating diversity and people. If we can't even appreciate that another culture from ours differs on religious beliefs, then how do we expect to conduct any business, establish life-long lasting friendships/relationships, etc.? This led me to think next about what is going on in the world today. The simple statement, "if you are not with me, you are against me" type of mentality. Why does it have to be so extreme? We don't tell each other that simply because our friend didn't eat chicken for dinner instead of beef, that they are no longer are our friends or we want nothing to do with them. And yet, when it comes to accepting that we might differ on other views is somehow so "impossible" to grasp. Although this is a very simplified comparison, next time we watch the news or read another article that tends to lean towards a biased view, think about this.
I thought since I haven't discussed any issues pertaining to currency, that for this week I would talk about international currencies, specifically the euro. Back before the Greek crisis was even an issue, I thought to myself what would happen if the euro would collapse? If you stop and think about it, while it is convenient for the Union to have one single currency, it has its pitfalls just as well. If inflation rises, then it rises all over those countries in regards to currency that is. If the value of the euro drops, then it would be also have an impact. If you run out (physically out of paper notes), which actually did happen in Greece, then what? How do you replace what we call "money"? Apart from the fact that the Greek crisis was one of the worst in history, it also is not a well known fact that back when Greece was applying to be a part of the Union, it initially was denied entrance, due to already a for-seeing possibility it wouldn't be able to keep up with the economic demands to maintain the euro. Greece was already in deficit, and in addition didn't even qualify for the minimum standards to join. Yet, it persuaded the EU officials that it would come up with the money it's lacking by tourism. Fast forward five to seven years later and nothing had changed. This shows that despite what any given country might state and believe it will make a positive impact, there should be boundaries set, if you can't meet the basic criteria, no excuses. That is the mistake that EU made with Greece, being too soft when it should have stood its ground.
No matter what culture we come from, no matter what our beliefs are, November 13th will now be a historical moment for all of us. Let us not forget that we are all human and despite our differences we should not stoop so low as to entirely lose respect for human life. It really is stunning that when it comes to doing business on an international level, people are willing to sacrifice, ignore, or tolerate one another in sole purpose of gaining money or customers. Yet, when it comes to religion it is as though that same concept doesn't exist. It's simply not feasible. Let this be a step forward to achieve that goal.
China recently stated that the yuan would most likely be added to the IMF. US was supposed to vote whether or not to include the yuan (also known as renminbi) as the fifth member of the "special drawing rights currency basket". The interesting part is that since China controls its currency and keeps it as specific rate so curb inflation, does that really make it a reliable currency to enter into the basket? While no currency is really "safe"from any economic downturns, should the IMF really be allowing a currency that is "stable" only due to factitious reasons be allowed to play such a major role in the international community? According to some experts the effect would not be felt until Q3 of 2016. While this should increase the interest of investors, it also seems to me that one should be cautious to tread into these waters and join the bandwagon if you will simply because it's the popular thing to do for the short time. Although it's been stable, is there a possibility of yet another Greek crisis?
First of all, as the year is drawing to a close, I would like to say HAPPY NEW YEARS! S NOVIM GODOM! Bonne année! Sal no mobarak! Sawasdee Pii Mai Krab!
As the year is ending, there are a lot of different issues that have arisen throughout this year. I felt like actually discussing more holidays and how they vary from culture to culture. For example, a new year for China or Iran calendar wise, is not celebrated on December 31/January 1. Instead, the Persian New Year is celebrated in March, while the Chinese New Year is celebrated at the end of January into almost end of February. This got me thinking as to how throughout the years classmates, friends, and even strangers have asked me how holidays in Russia are different from the United States. Can you imagine if New Years is entirely different for a couple of the countries I mentioned, how drastically different is it for any other holiday? Here is a food for thought, Thanksgiving, is a US traditional holiday, due to Columbus discovering the Americas. No, other countries don't have this holiday obviously, but there are numerous other holidays that are celebrated throughout the year that that each country has while the next one doesn't. I find it fascinating that it is during happy and sad times the world comes together. While my earlier post discussed very tragic events, this one also has something that brings all of us together. Celebration and joy! The entire world comes together when a new year begins, whether it officially starts on January 1st, or another day, it still brings all of us together.Women's International Day is March 8. But how many countries actually celebrate that? I know for me growing up in Moscow, even young girls were always praised on this day. When I came to the United States, a lot of my classmates had no clue what that meant. This makes me wonder what other countries have holidays that I or thousands of other people haven't ever heard of?
Corruption; we all know it exists despite us wanting to turn our heads the other way a lot of times. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 which was implemented in the US requires transparency and prohibits from bribing foreign officials. A lot of issues arise when conducting business with the US, because of this legislation. While the rest of the world functions on bribes and money circulating around officials, security, etc. the United States is one of the few countries that actually has strict regulations that outlaw such acts. So my main question is how beneficial is it and does it really prevent bribery or merely a roadblock of conducting business? From an international stand point, while it is great to lead by a positive example, it really does hinder a lot of potential transactions when other countries conduct business in one manner, and the way they've always known, and yet US steps in and says but not here! I do agree it is a tough subject to discuss, because there really isn't a right or wrong answer. If the entire country functions in one manner, can we honestly say that it is wrong/if it works for them and it is efficient, what right do we have as another country to say no, that is not how it should be done. On other hand, corruption leads to greed and power, thus there really doesn't seem to be that many positive points that outweigh the negatives to say yes corruption is great. I do see that let's say for countries in Africa, a lot of bribery occurs in that region, but what happens if a company from the US wants to open a location in that region, however, it outright refuses to participate/carry on business that involves corruption. On one hand the company doesn't have to expand to that region, if it already knows that's the main issue and there isn't much else to be said. On the other hand, at what point does a company or companies continue to limit themselves and refuse to notice potential long-term goals outweigh the short-term bribery/it hinders it's own future? It's definitely a hard topic, however, realistically how much of the world will be shut off if US decides that simply because they implemented this legislation the rest of the world has to agree/alter how other countries run? It's a great moral example yes, but until other parts of the world decide to alter their views on bribery, you really can't force them to understand yours/follow yours.
Given that there a lot of issues that are going on in the world right now, I want to pose a question for those who follow this blog. If terrorism is what everyone is very concerned and afraid about, then why is it that no single country has come up to the plate and stated that it doesn't matter what religion it is, terrorism is a concept of it's own? Before anyone decides to talk negatively about anything else, has anyone actually studied Islam? Has anyone actually studied Buddhism? Has anyone actually studied Hinduism? Before anyone makes any comments about how they can't stand a specific religion, I would strongly advise learning about it While there is no denial that a specific religion might play a role, at what point do we ask ourselves that it could be any given religion? Christianity was forced upon the Native Americans in the now United States, while India saw the bhakti movement. So, what difference does it make between religions if we refuse to even learn the basics about each one, before we judge? At this point wouldn't it be sensible to state that no religion is susceptible to terrorism? I know I have trailed off from a business perspective, however, that is part of what international business/relations is about. You learn about different religions, cultures, foods, customs, etc. and you don't judge. You evaluate and learn to understand what not to do and do in the countries you visit. Whether it is something you believe in, disagree on, or follow, it doesn't matter. You respect each country's point of view, culture, and laws, and if you do't like them, then do something about it. Complaining about something, but not really solving the issue at hand is called whining. And unless we all realize that different religions do exist, and they aren't going away, then you might as well state that you refuse to eat food. It doesn't make sense right? That is how each country views other country's perspective/ demand on why they should change
As this month is ending I have been doing research on various subjects and made me want to talk about cyber security. The recent article I read stated that only a quarter of businesses are aware that they lack measures to prevent hacks, and then less than a quarter actually believe that they are prone to a potential attack. My first thought is more of are you kidding me and how foolish do those businesses have to be in our technologically advanced world to not even protect yourself thoroughly? Although this is an entirely different topic, it does tie into the international relations/business concept overall without a doubt. The main concept I would take away from this is that we are all interconnected. We have cell phones that give us access to the internet in an instant. We can make phone calls and send messages in seconds, and can talk to someone from literally across the world. It's amazing, and yet we should be aware that being safe and aware doesn't have boundaries or borders. This concept goes for everyone. What amazes me is that if you are an international corporation, your priority should be awareness and security of your company's information. Excuses do not justify the problems that you end up dealing with or the explanations you present to your clients. In this day and age there could only be real risks that are harder to eliminate and entirely prevent, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't strive to be better at detecting them. I found it a surprising number, however, let's hope that as time continues it will be lower not higher.
What are the benefits of tariffs? On one hand you have more control over the products that are coming into the country, and therefore are more aware of what goes in and out. On the other hand, how many of us want to pay extra money additionally on top of the cost of the item? A very positive side to this issue is the fact that specific countries and parts of the world have created trade agreements between each other thus eliminating those tariffs. For example, ASEA (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) is one of such agreements. Countries in this area include Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. Vietnam actually joined in 1995. And a couple other countries joined later as well. This means that as long as products flow within these countries are free from tariffs that would be typically imposed. This also creates more competition and attracts foreign investments. Although as I've stated no one likes to have an extra additional cost, the benefits of these agreements outweigh the costs, at least for these countries. United States is part of a trade agreement called NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement). It's also interesting that since multiple agreements exist, countries can work on better rates between each part of the world due to having partnerships and being outside of one agreement, but being part of another.
The cost of living in each country is different, naturally due to the economic status of that country. While Europe is dealing with its Euro issue, Asia is having to deal with its pollution. What i find interesting is that to a certain degree we as humans have the ability to control certain factors to ensure a better life for everyone. There will always be people that oppose lowering prices, maybe even losing some money, if in the end the entire country would be better off, rationally we should acknowledge that could be one of the options in order to solve the problem. With pollution, naturally cutting down on production or halting the construction of factories would be an option. Since the turn over rate of the workers is high, it really isn't in the best of interests of those factories to shut down. Le alone the amount of products that get shipped out is so high, it is better to lose a few hundred here and there, instead of shutting down several of the factories. With the Euro, currency is a bit more complex to discuss since it dives into economic concepts/multiple factors play a role in how the currency functions. I've discussed currency in my earlier posts, however, in this case currency is part of the GDP and depending on how it fluctuates could either cause the country to be in a depression or in a boom. As an end note I want to emphasize just because a country is expensive to live in, doesn't mean that its that simple of an answer as some might think.
I'm sure that by now a lot of the world knows about what is being called "Panama Papers." Recall I have discussed corruption before. The fact that these papers uncover just how complex relationships between countries are, should answer the question as to how is this possible. I actually have studied offshore banking, and understand that it's not as simple of a subject to grasp as some might think. As some of the articles have uncovered, offshore banking isn't illegal. The question that comes into play is how or can one prove that the account was created to directly avoid paying taxes. If a person who has been paying his/her taxes all of his life happens to open a business or an account offshore, does that automatically categorize him/her as guilty of avoiding payment? No. There has to be proof that by opening the account, it was done so specifically to avoid paying a tax on the business or businesses. However, simply by having an offshore account doesn't constitute it so. The problem lies with the fact of having evidence and proving that the sole purpose of opening these accounts is to avoid tax payments. While no one argues that clearly there is an issue with this, I also do hope that my readers research more about this issue before taking a stance on this issue. We should really understand that at the core we all have the right and freedom to open accounts in any country or part of the world we want to. It is only if there is evidence and proof that these accounts are created in order to avoid paying taxes, or to shelter a company from having to pay full amount it owes does it become an issue. If anything this debate sparks a bigger issue of how do we as the world deal with corruption and ensure that those who create or continue to ignore it will be held responsible?
Today is Russian Independence Day, however it is not the standard independence day that everyone would think of. I have always found it very interesting when anyone I talk to whether it's friends, classmates, or anyone else I encounter by what do I mean it's different? US celebrates its independence from Great Britain, when it actually became it's own country. Russia, however, was already an established country and May 9 commemorates the end of WWII and victory over Adolf Hitler. It's not really the independence day that one would think of establishing a brand new state, but instead victory over an enemy that was attempting to overthrow the country. Thus, it's more of an acknowledgement of the sacrifice the people made in order to save their homeland. The parade is held at the Red Square and all the veterans who are fully dressed in uniform with their medals hanging on their chests are in attendance. The day is filled with festivities and a commencement speech is usually given at the end of it all. On the other hand,France celebrates its independence day July 14, which is actually only ten days later after US's. China celebrates its October 1. Meanwhile Australia celebrates its January 1, give and take of how one views the New Year, literally what most of the countries celebrate as the New Year. It's always unique to hear that the way cultures celebrate even common holidays in such a variety of ways. Maybe we should strive to learn more of such facts instead of making judgments as to why it's so unusual.
Over the weekend we lost a great legend, one that is world known-Muhammad Ali. He was not only one of the greatest boxers ever known, but a very generous and caring man. Just to quote something of his: "Champions aren't made in gyms. Champions are made from something they have deep inside them-a desire, a dream, a vision. They have to have the skill, and the will. But the will must be stronger than the skill."Just those words alone are powerful and speak on his behalf of how he viewed life. Never give up! There is a lot to take away from his life. The main concept I want to stress is despite his career in boxing, he was such a peaceful and honorable man. He traveled to Iraq during the Gulf War, he carried the torch during the 1996 Summer Olympics, he visited Ennis, County Clare, Ireland which was home to his great-grandfather who immigrated to the US in 1860's. Those are just some of the examples, which prove that apart from doing what he loved he was one of the international legends that actively sought to make this world more understanding. All of us can learn something from his experiences. Not all of us want to be a boxer, but we can certainly learn that even someone who rose from the very bottom had respect for other cultures and traditions that we don't seem to discuss enough. Leading by example-that should be our goal, to strive to show not just talk but show with our actions as to how countries from all over the world can unite and live in harmony. May he rest in peace and may we all take this man's words and actions as a stepping stone to move forward.
By now everyone around the world has heard of Britain voting in a referendum to leave the EU or what was called by the media "Brexit". Amidst all the different articles that followed the news, one caught my attention more so. The article was written by a professor of EU and Human Rights Law at the University of Essex. In it, Professor Steve Peers analyzes what is next for Britain, how does Article 50 of the Treaty of European Union apply to Britain's exit and the future relationship between UK and EU. I found it to be intriguing that amidst all the economic impacts this will have on the other countries, not that many people took the time to really ask more thorough questions such as this professor had. Everyone understands that the stock markets felt the impact, that value of the currencies felt the impact, that trade will now be altered. However, no one really bothered to dive into the legal aspect of the all the treaties and laws that will now be amended. Article 50 of the Treaty of European Union provides a withdrawal process which in this case is a two-year period after which Britain will officially have left the EU. It is up to the UK to notify the EU, and the time frame can be shorter. The article doesn't provide any concrete regulations on whether the decision to withdraw can be pulled once it is made. According to Peers's outlook for UK's future the best option is for them to remain under the European Economic Area which is an agreement between the EU, Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein. Since they will have to create a new treaty to establish regulations/laws between other countries, for the short term this is the best option. I do find this to be a very efficient and logical step to take. While every decade, century, and millennia has had it's own historical events, this is one of those moments for ours.
Seems that my posts have become a more once a month type, which is entirely fine. With election season upon US, hope that my readers have kept up with some of it. The main concept I've been thinking about is while US is a young country for sure, it's also amazing to think about the Constitution and how it's been written by men that not only were very intelligent and educated, but could for see and think about the future so ahead to write laws that would tramp time, in other words timeless. It takes a specific type of a person/attitude to be able to write something that doesn't just pertain to the current life/society and still looks ahead tramping any beliefs, or biases, and wants the world to be a better place/sees that there are certain rights not just legally speaking, but humane wise that we all deserve. That is not something most people even think twice about discussing. I meant think about it, if we gathered a group of legislators, writers, scientists, etc. what would they come up with for centuries down the road that would build everybody up or create a type of a system that regardless of anyone's beliefs or culture would create a system that continues on. That is what should be appreciated, not whether one detail of an amendment should be continuously fought in court or taking your personal beliefs and shoving an agenda that benefits you or your colleagues for a short time frame.
The Summer Olympics began this week. I specifically do not want to discuss the controversy that surrounds them, but instead focus on the positive that hardly anyone thinks about. Watching the last part of the Opening Ceremony with the carrying of the Olympic flag proceeded by the lighting of the torch made me think of what the term international really means. For a short time frame, regardless of what disagreements, arguments, or differences there might be, the entire world comes together for the games. That to me is true beauty! If we had more events that were on such a grand scale, I truly believe the entire planet would be better off. Although this year I didn't get to see the procession of each country coming into the stadium, I do recall it four years ago, and just generally the feeling I personally got from seeing the smiling faces and the true care of everyone just for one short moment focusing on the amazing talent brought together. Recall that the Greeks were the first who started the Olympic games in Olympia (hence the name) tracing as far back as 776 B.C. The original games were more of a religious ceremony dedicated to the Greek gods and Zeus. Interestingly enough they were held every 4 years, and we as humanity have preserved that rule. It was also part of their belief that during these games all conflicts between the city-states would be postponed until the end of the games. That to me speaks volumes. This in itself shows honor, respect, and not just a standard but true human capacity for understanding one another. For once everyone agreed that during these games, there was no room for arguing and bickering. So that makes me wonder, if we are capable to set all of our differences aside just for a short time frame, can we not strive/challenge one another to do the same outside of the games? Is it then not feasible to say that world peace is possible if only we would realize our full capacity to truly appreciate our differences? If we are able to postpone any issues for a short time frame, why not come to a rational understanding of it without a time limit? Let that sink in as the games continue.
This week was the International Peace Day which got me thinking about an earlier post I had written a while back about peace in the world. I don't believe that realistically it's something that we shouldn't strive for, but given the nature of humans, it still comes down to greed and desire for power. My main thought for this week is what is the point of having these international holidays, do they actually help humanity strive to be better? Apart from the title/name of them, do we actually pay attention and strive to make the world a better place? One of the articles I read was discussing the ICC (International Chamber of Commerce) nominating businesses for the 2017 Oslo Business for Peace Awards. It continued to elaborate about businesses that have combined both it's mission statement and ethics to go above and beyond making communities and people's lives better, then they have made the world a better place. I agree. Although it is not discussed often, there are businesses that combine both the concept of making a profit, while at the same time also having a positive influence morally and ethically. The perfect words I want to leave my readers with were said by the 2015 Business for Peace Honouree CEO of Unilever Paul Polman,"If you are not here to improve the world, then why are you here?"
This week i want discuss the topic of cyber bullying Although this isn't so much a cultural topic, and yet at the same time it is. Cyber bullying tramps all cultures, all religions, any political views, etc. It doesn't matter what your views are, it is not ever okay or right to target and humiliate someone over their opinions. Although there's numerous discussions over this issue, it seems to me that it is not discussed enough. Just a couple weeks ago I read an article about a 14 year old boy dying as a result of being bullied online for quite some time and his mother was speaking out . While I understand that not all of us are able to ignore other's opinions whom we don't know, or don't respect, or ignore any negative talk, for some of us that doesn't come so easy. And for those of us who are able to help, should do so. What puzzles me is are there any statistics on how many people whether young or old are cyber bullied, and if so, the numbers by the country? Would the numbers be higher or lower in US versus Europe? Would they be relevant or even exist for other parts of the world? That is something that made me stop and think. And yet recall I noted in the beginning that it tramps all cultures, etc. It's a juxtaposition if you will, on one side it doesn't matter, but on another if we are to actively do something to change the world, we need to know the numbers and target the areas in the country, in other countries where it's the strongest. Thus I find this topic relevant as to more in depth questions about particular cultures, view points, physical characteristics, and so on so forth. If we are to really understand the reasoning behind cyber bullying, we need to realistically know both quantitative and qualitative data.
I thought I would discuss a topic that tramps all cultures. What does it mean to be ethical and honest? I have discussed before as far businesses being both ethically and morally responsible. However, this stems into more of how does each country view conducting business on an ethical level? What might be entirely acceptable and a standard with one country, might not stand with another. I find that the topic of ethics tramps cultures on a lot of different levels, however, it also is one of those topics that isn't as black and white as we paint it to be. If a culture accepts exaggeration as a norm and let's say that it's generally something one can observe that stories are embellished even if there is no rational reason behind it, then you learn to observe that to be a relative norm within that particular culture. If however, another culture finds bluntness to be the basic underlying behind how they carry themselves, embellishing even a simple story only disrespects them. Thus, by default regardless whether or not you agree with one or the other you begin to see the potential disrespect that could occur. Then we can stem into what does being honest mean? That also dives into different cultures, while one can handle brutal honesty and saying hey, this can be done better, this can look cleaner, the next one would find it rude and inappropriate if you were to directly say for instance "Your report is wrong, fix it." In cultures that are collective it is better to phrase yourself as to how to better improve next time, or how to work on better communication to accomplish the end goal together, instead of focusing on what one person did specifically wrong. As my readers can see, it is not so simple after all. All cultures have a way of handling misunderstandings, mistakes, and owning up to them. Whether something is ethical or not is not just a matter because that is the "norm." We should keep in mind that ethics should not ever be disregarded, but being culturally aware of how they differentiate matters.
As the calendar year comes to an end, where did it even go?!! I decided I would end my posts for it on this interesting point. The US had its elections last month, and Trump is now the president-elect until January 20th when he is sworn into the office. The very next day after the election was over, November 9, the stock markets plummeted and the business world was in turmoil. My point is this, given that global and international corporations have hundreds of offices and locations around the world, why would even those companies panic? Unless you are an American based company that was founded/started in the US, I don't see a reason as to how panicking benefits or really solves any uncertainty. The global companies if they find themselves that unstable can always shut down their operations, plants, offices, etc. in the country they are most uncertain about. I am not saying that this wouldn't be an issue on the financial side, on the losing employees, so on so forth, but from a business perspective, if the company is that concerned about its future and let's say the market it reaches in the US isn't even that big to begin with, it really would be easier to leave that country, focus on your other markets and other parts of the world, rather than jump in on the chaos and panic with everyone else. That is what international business is about. If you are a global company your concerns aren't just focused on one set area, you have to oversee and plan accordingly to each part of the world. If the company isn't doing so well in let's say Europe, than maybe they need to focus their efforts and goals on Central Asia and if the results will help in the bigger scheme of things, they could end up having to close their offices in Europe. That is part of the business. This of course given the fact that the company is not American based, but if it is, even then while I understand very well the concept of uncertainty any possible policies, regulations, so on so forth would not all a sudden halt the entire world's trade and conducting business. That is just the extreme notion. So instead of panicking, the companies should sit still, maybe think on a strategic level as to what could be predicted in the foreseeable future and be prepared to adjust accordingly, but no one can know for sure all of the problems that could arise, that is the reality. Therefore, before panicking the businesses should realistically evaluate how they would be impacted and what would change, not just jump to a conclusion oh, everyone else is freaking out, we should too. As I said, unless its a US based company, the global companies whose markets and emphasis isn't even a priority in US, have no reason to jump to such drastic conclusions. Yes, trade and economic development have the potential to be affected, but that's a given and until the person takes office, what good does panicking do? I hope this makes some people consider that not everything is as easy as it seems from the first glance.
As the year comes to a close I decided to write about one of the most influential aspects of our modern time-the internet. Let's face it, without it we are like little kids demanding chocolate, when our parents tell us we need to eat dinner first. The vast amount of connections it has brought in each one of our lives is just one of the key advantages that it has brought into our lives. A friend of mine recently noted that Canada recently has made it a requirement to have internet available to anyone and everyone as a basic necessity for life. That doesn't surprise me whatsoever. Let's go back to how we have evolved as humanity throughout centuries. We can easily stem back as far as even when electricity was discovered. After all without it, none of this would be possible in the first place. At first there were candles, then there was a shift to kerosene lamps, and before you know the very first electric light bulb was invented. Naturally the same happened with cars. At first there were just horses, then carriages, submarines, steamboats, railroads, and finally what evolved into modern day cars. As we can see as a society we have continued evolving throughout time on a variety of levels. It makes sense that the internet has integrated into our lives so much as the basic necessity of electricity and running water. Ask yourself how many businesses would shut down without it? That in itself should show how much of an influence it has in our daily lives. Without it, I wouldn't even be writing this post right now. Thus, the main conclusion we can draw from this is that we can only hope that all other countries come to such an understanding that it's the natural evolving process of our technological advancement. We have so much potential to do good, and technology is at the very core of it. To all a HAPPY NEW YEAR! C NOVIM GODOM, S NOVIM SCHASTIEM!
"Change"-that is what the United States President Barack Obama's slogan was for his campaign eight years ago when he first ran for office. It is exactly what he ended on for his farewell speech this past week. If you think about it, there were a lot of changes in the country. For one, the economy was at it's poorest since the Great Depression and yet Obama did improve for it to rise again. Gay and lesbian marriage became legal when no one thought it was realistic, and additionally the country saw the passage of what is known as the Affordable Care Act for the health insurance reform across the entire nation. Change; one word, and yet so much depth to it. In fact it is the only constant we can rely on, that life will continue changing. I do find the words and the whole concept inspiring. We as humans regardless of cultures, beliefs, governments, should strive to embrace change. It doesn't mean it's always going to be easy or in the manner we wish it to be, but if all of us would seek to go with the flow change then life becomes easier on a lot of different levels. Historically humans fear change because of the uncertainty that comes with it. Interestingly enough this actually ties into the term itself, as I have studied the correlation between cultures and their way of handling uncertainty. Some do strive to embrace it, while others do poorly, which also shows that we have the capacity to alter our attitudes at any point and time. Change; neither good nor bad, but just is. Yes, a lot has changed with US, reestablishing Cuban relations is another example that can very well be attributed to Obama. Whether some of us agree or disagree on positive versus negative aspects, it still is change. So instead of being cynical and throwing negativity let's strive to desire that change.
My birthday weekend; feels a bit different. I'm going to do something entirely different for this post. As much controversy as there has been on immigration in the US, I want to take the moment to not inform my readers of anything new, but to thank those who read this blog, even those who are not aware it exists, for being aware that ignorance exists teaches people. At the end of the day, we are all human. And the one thing that studying different cultures has taught me is that you become more accepting and appreciative of all the differences that exist. Not everything that I have written on here, or anything anyone believes is always going to be met at one hundred percent, but it doesn't matter. What matters is that we as humans have the capacity to change the world. Whether we acknowledge it or not, there is always room for growth. This doesn't have to be something negative, but in fact can be spun towards something positive. So here is my challenge to my readers, go out and do something new that is not part of your routine. This doesn't have to be something new culturally wise, as much as that would be interesting, not really the point. Do something this week that you have never done before, whether its visiting a place, a person, participating in an activity, whatever the case might be, do something that might feel uncomfortable. That is where growth lies. That is where understanding about life begins.
Spring is here! Let's start off with something fresh and unique. International marketing-how many of you are aware of what that term means? We all are aware of what marketing in itself means, commercials, ads, targeting audience members based on age, demographics, etc. but did you know that international marketing not only includes all of the above, but also cultural differences, space and time concepts, as well as religious beliefs? Unlike just general marketing, which in this case, I'll use the term to mean within the United States borders, international marketing has to consider all of the differences I mentioned above, and even more. I had to do a marketing project with a group in one of my courses, and to our surprise trying to create a marketing plan to bring a US product into Argentina turned out to be not so simple. In fact, the sauce that chose not only did not exist in Argentinian culture, but they were not familiar, nor would they understand what the ingredients were or what they would use the sauce for. We chose a steak sauce, and as we continued researching we found out that the concept of a steak sauce does not exist in Argentina. Their ethnic food already has a variety of spices, and the closest resembling product is used on a variety of dishes, thus it didn't even make sense to bring in a separate sauce that no one has ever heard of. So we had to come up with a different approach as to how we would market it. That my readers is an example of how unique international marketing is. Not only do the teams /companies have to design a plan that caters to the country, city, culture, etc. but they also have to consider how does that region operate, what are the nuances of that particular culture, likes, dislikes, do they have a similar product, would they understand the translation, and don't forget the language barrier. What one phrase means in one language, might not necessarily mean the same in another. International marketing has to not only cater to the physical region its focusing on, but also the subtle parts of the culture. Global companies have a lot more work and research that is required to market in different countries. That is something that we all should appreciate, studying and analyzing differences in the world is not easy.
Twenty-first century, we are on a move to establishing life on Mars. What does that mean for the international community? Everyone at this point who keeps up with my posts is aware and knows what the Cold War was about-the Space Race. What I want to touch base on is the overall concept of community. We have so much potential to work together on an international level, hence the International Space Station, we should be progressing to not just the concept of equality, but general global understanding of what it means to work in a group dynamic that incorporates all cultures, all beliefs, etc.-GLOBAL! This got me thinking as far as international business on a very broad level, how do we work as a team when it comes to something so massive. This is beyond just doing business of another company that wants to work overseas. This is about humanity. So how do we come together and unite? It starts with small steps, what is our goal as humanity? Per Musk, he wants to have a living colony on Mars. That is what our goal should be, not focusing on what each country believes, implements, or regulates, but rather what can achieve together? Do we want to strive and dare make history? If we do, then we should all have one goal-to make it happen! That at the core should be the underlining core of everything that is done from this point forward. Both SpaceX and Blue Origin have similar goals, but they are now competitors. Do we want to continue creating more of competition, or do we want to work as one and achieve the ultimate goal of establishing life on Mars? If that is the goal, then I do believe at some point people realize the actual achievement they become a part of, and go from there. No one is saying that every little detail will go smoothly, but if we all decide that doing something that changes history for the better is far more crucial than our differences, that is when real change will come into place.
Lately I've been thinking, customer service is something that is provided regardless of what business you are in. Whether it is international or not, every business still has customers, clients, etc. that they provide services or products to. So what distinguishes excellent customer service from just O.K.? First of all it is not only the business's mission statement, but also what clientele they attract. You get customers that are constantly rude, and don't appreciate the service you provide, then it will continue to be that way. Now if there is a serious issue and the business is trying it's best to handle the situation, then the customers that are rude, could be annoyed, but need to understand that not all problems can be solved right away. Sure there will be frustrated people, some don't know how to be polite but firm, but it is up to the business to handle the situation to reassure its customers that everything will be taken care of. On an international level, one has to consider the difference of cultures. For example, if you ask someone from an Asian country if there is a problem, they will come back to say there isn't one. You have to know how to phrase yourself to relate the actual issue at hand. This is because at the core of it if they were to admit there is a problem that would cause them to "lose face", something that is frowned upon in that culture. In Europe, however, one can be more direct in conveying if there is a problem. Therefore, customer service is not so clear cut as one might think when conducting international business. It is always a good idea to show respect, politeness, and genuine interest in trying to solve or fix any customer service problem that might have arisen. Language is the key. Learn the culture you are wanting to do business with, learn the country's standards, and then you can focus on providing the best customer service possible.
For today's post I am going to copy and paste a link to a poll I'm conducting in regards to my book I'm publishing this fall. Please take a look and participate!
What does the term "global" mean? As our technology has expanded and we have become so interconnected that this word is at intertwined from food to products to clothes. Yet, how many of us stop to think of what the term really implies? A global company or a global business is not the same as conducting global business. While a global business means that that particular company conducts business around the world, when referring to the term as an action conducting global business refers to international trade around the globe. The two are similar in nature, global business can be traced back even to the roots of the Silk Road. The Silk Road ran from Eurasia, connecting East to West, stretching to the Korean Peninsula and Japan to the Mediterranean sea. The term was coined after the silk and horses that were exchanged through an extensive network of trade routes. Centuries ago, and yet what we now describe as global was already something the world did that long ago. Today, if I were to ask everyone around the room we would all name at least top five companies we know that are considered global. The interesting part is that even though our ways of doing business have changed, overall we need each other to continue living on this planet. We have nuts and fruit that come from southern regions that are not available up north. Yet, we have vegetables and other crops that thrive in northern climates that would not survive the heat. I find it fascinating that people at any point and time might have considered globalism to not be something we should study or pay attention to. For thousands of years that is how relationships, connections, and trade has been established. Let us not forget that despite our differences we still need each other for living a sustainable life.
It has been a while since I have written a post. Taking some experience from my work environment I wanted to discuss the concept of knowing different languages. While I do speak two different languages, and understand the third one on a basic level, I do find it amazing and even up-lifting when I hear others say they can speak a language I do not speak. I also find myself wanting to learn even more languages and to be able to communicate with others in their native tongue. It is such a gift to be able to speak multiple languages and relate to other cultures. I do hope that all of those who read my blog will not stop at striving to continue learning, continuing to grow, and strive to push yourself to want to speak to others in their native tongue. Language is a very fascinating topic. Apart from the vast amount we have in the world, we also have individual dialects that exist. You can travel from one part of the country to another and find where one phrase is used another one is not. If language is the only barrier we have in conducting business, in truly understanding one another, then we are certainly limiting ourselves on a level that is much easier to study and fix than anything else. It does not come easy, and it does require work. However, if men have fallen in love with a woman and have dedicated their lives to learn her native tongue to understand her better, shouldn't we as a world strive to do the same to be able to carry on our daily activities more efficiently? How much easier would the international community work if people made an effort to actively learn at least the basic phrases to be able to communicate with one another the next time they see each other? You don't know a language, find a friend, a coworker, a stranger, and ask for their help to learn at least one or two common phrases that will help you in life.
I am writing not on a typical day that I usually do. There are a lot of news that happened from my last post, and yet, there are also a lot of thoughts. The world seems to fee it's in a disarray, and yet here we are. How about we take humanity back? Dinosaurs? I remember the first time I ever saw a skeleton of one. It was fascinating. I didn't even understand what it was. How do we tell our children that these creatures existed? They walked the same land we are stepping feet on? The huge creatures that could both fly and walk? I was astonished by what I saw. I will keep this one short. If we can still find historical evidence of creatures that are that big, why are we questioning history?
As this year is ending, I have to say thank you to all of you who have been actively reading my blog. It has been an incredible year for sure! Although life can be crazy and we all have our differences, let's take the time to be thankful for the wonderful memories this year has brought to all of us. As I've written before, New Year's is an interesting time for a variety of cultures. Not all of us celebrate it as the actual calendar year ends. Not every culture even fully follows the Gregorian calendar either. I have had several topics that were suggested for my newest posts. However, I want to focus on an interesting topic-bitcoin. It has recently been in the news for the rise of its price. Cryptocurrency has been a fascinating topic that has grown as a wide interest. Not only has it been something that the financial industry has had a watchful eye on, but also one that is changing the way we do business. Financial transactions are no longer made just through paper. We are in an age where everything is digital. Some believe that since the price of bitcoin fluctuates so drastically, it is still not worthwhile. Others think that it's going to continue growing and will become a replacement of how financial transactions are done. What do my readers think? Is bitcoin woerth it, or have we simply gotten used to everything being "instant" and "electronic"so much, that even our basic purchase power has to be at our fingertips? Some cyber security experts argue that bitcoin is still too new and can be taken advantage of for those who want to commit fraud. It can also become a leeway for even more dangerous threats for any future attacks. Where will 2018 take us?
I am writing on not my typical time frame, however, something caught my interest. Some people compare Elon Musk to Henry Ford. From SpaceX to Tesla, the man has been called a genius of our times. What I find intriguing is that all of us should strive to make the world a better place. We need a man like him to push our society to do better, but that does not mean we are not capable of things ourselves. It takes a team to win a match. Even in tennis, there is still a team of people that support that one single player. Think about the enormous amount of people that Elon has behind him. Did that all get built in a day? Of course not! What we could learn from a man like him is not just efficiency, but also to truly make the world a better place. An electric car? Who could have thought about that concept fifty, or even thirty years ago? We all have something we dream about to come true. Make it happen! It takes your friends, family, even strangers to make some of those dreams come true. People that push society to be better don't always think they are right, nor do they ever give up. Henry Ford believed in something that was beyond astonishing to the rest of the world. Model T is one of the most fascinating concepts to me. Shouldn't we continue to astonish ourselves?
https://www.stedwards.edu/business/polina-anastassieva. Please go visit and read the article. I am proud to be part of this community and again a thank you for all the support to my family, friends, and everyone involved in this.
While it has been a while since I have written something on here, I am going to venture off and ask my readers to please visit my LinkedIn page, and message me with suggestions with what might be a good topic to discuss, or what strikes your interest that isn't discussed often.
This past week I was in a car accident. Thankfully I am alright, and so is the other driver. This got me thinking, I don't believe this subject is discussed often-driving laws and driving standards in other countries. In Europe for instance, the drivers seat is located on the right side of the vehicle, as opposed to the left in the US. I remember even as a child when I would see that in various cars in Moscow it would strike me as interesting and unusual. Has anyone ever wondered why Japan has such small vehicles? It's due to the limited space and such high population that they have to account for. I watched a video for one of my classes where one of the locals was actually explaining how they are taught to parallel park the cars in a manner that would take up the least amount of space possible. At what age do most people begin driving in US? It used to be 16, I know Texas has discussed changing it to 18. For Germany, you have to be 17 with supervision. For Bahrain you have to be 18. As you can see, although it varies within a couple of years, for the most part the driving age is relatively the same across the world. The type of cars also varies from one country to the next. There is a Russian term used for describing the type of cars that are "foreign", and thus when I moved here I was constantly telling my family there are so many of them! My family had to explain to me that it was just a different standard and in US that was the norm. If you think about all the different regulations that each country implements, while the concept of driving still remains the same, there are little nuances that vary and distinguish each one of them.
For this week's post I am going to say thank you to everyone who has been supportive of my writing. While there are a lot of things going on in the news, there is a time to rest and there is a time to write. Appreciating what we have living in such a high paced world is something we do not reflect on enough. I will challenge my readers to look up something new about a religion or a culture they are not familiar with and find something that might change your life.
I had a couple of ideas what to discuss for this week, however, in the wake of the news I want to dedicate this post in the memory of Anthony Bourdain. I want everyone to truly think about how many lives this man has touched and influenced. When I think about international business, and throughout watching his show I would think to myself this man understands what acceptance means. He was always wanting and willing to learn something new. To be able to be not just want to experience new things, but to also truly want to understand different cultures, ideas, cuisine, etc. that is what makes it different. We all have our faults, but I cannot even begin to state how much we all should aspire to be that open and thrive off the unknown. He traveled throughout the world leaving his footprints wherever he went. The thousands of lives he has touched will now be more loving, aware, and inspired to live a better life. Food and drink will always bring people together. It doesn't matter whether it's one culture or another. Politics, businesses, all of that set aside, to have the desire to understand why a certain culture has its beliefs and values, but to also be able to share a meal as the quote states, is growth. I know that apart from admiration, he is a respected man. Let that sink in. We should want that towards everyone. Respect and willingness to learn, always. I am ending this with another quote by him, "Without experimentation, a willingness to ask questions and try new things, we shall surely become static, repetitive, and moribund."-Anthony Bourdain.
For this week I want to focus on a topic that is something people within the business world would be more aware about. Does anyone know what states are the easiest to incorporate a business in? They are Delaware, Nevada, and Wyoming. I decided to research the difference between incorporating a business in the US versus other countries such as Japan. In order for you to incorporate your business in Japan, one must find a representative or a third party to manage the capital. Once the articles of incorporation have been established and notarized, you actually have to use the investor's personal bank account before registration is complete. Something that would most likely cause a sense of uneasiness if done in US. If you are a non-Japanese director, you have to apply for a visa fora status of residency. Another country that I found interesting is Australia. To my surprise, I found out that when incorporating a business there are some words you cannot use without the government's approval, such as "bank, trust, royal, and incorporated." This leads to a limit for the type of businesses one wants to operate. As it means that if you are wanting to be in the financial sector, you have to be aware to not use the term bank unless you become one. The business is required to show its liability status. "If a company's members' liability is limited to the amount unpaid on their shares, the name must end with 'Proprietary Limited'" (ASIC). I find that such factors play a key role when establishing any type of business, or even expanding one and opening a new office in a different country.
First of all I must say congratulations to Russia to winning today's match in the World Cup and advancing into the quarter finals!!!!!! POZDRAVLAU!!! What an amazing game and truly that is what I consider international competition at it's best! It is a privilege to be able to have both the American and the Russian cultures in my life. There were a couple of other topics I wanted to discuss for this week, one of which involves electricity. However, since the World Cup is going on right now, and we only have a couple more weeks left until the finals, I am going to focus my attention on this. I have written about the Olympics before, and how the world comes together to participate in sports, and just for a moment every quarrel, every war is forgotten. I believe it is similar when it comes to the World Cup. Countries from all over the world have fought to be in the spots they are now to make it to the top. As I was watching the game, I noticed such sportsmanship and such true respect between the opposing teams, it is truly a sight to see. It makes me proud to know that even despite competition and playing a sport, these teams still have such high respect for one another that they still hold out a hand to help one another up off the field. They still shake hands for a match well played, and well deserved win. They still act with dignity. That is what all of us should strive to do. Despite whatever disappointments, or differences, to be able to walk away knowing you did your best and you are proud of whoever you competed against, that I truly admire. Thank you to everyone who continues reading these posts, please continue watching the matches!
Thomas Edison invented the light bulb, but does anyone know how why there is such a difference of voltage standards among countries? Most of European countries have a standard between 220 and 240 volts. Whereas, Japan and most of the Americas are half of that within the range of 100 and 127 volts. It was actually Nikola Tesla who created a system of three-phase alternating current electrical generation and distribution. Tesla concluded that 60 Hertz was the best frequency for the alternating current. His preference was for 240 volts, and that put him at odds with Edison. Edison's direct currents were at 110 volts. "When the German company AEG built the first European generating facility, its engineers decided to fix the frequency at 50 Hz, because the number 60 did not fit the metric standard unit sequence. At that time, AEG had a virtual monopoly and their standard spread to the rest of the continent. In Britain, differing frequencies proliferated, and only after World War II the 50-cycle standard was established. At the time the US also wanted to change but because of the cost involved to replace all electric appliances, they decided not to...the average US household already had a fridge, a washing-machine, etc., but not in Europe."(worldstandards.eu). As a result light bulbs would burn out rather quickly, with too high of voltage or not enough of it. The solution was to supply 240 volts splitting it in half at 120 between all the houses combined. This is why when traveling to Europe you should use a converter if the appliances are from the Americas. Japan and Brazil are actually a couple of exceptions with varied standards throughout different regions of the country.
In my undergraduate program, for one of my speech courses I did a speech on the Egyptian Book of the Dead. I always found the Egyptian culture and history very fascinating. Even before I moved to the US, one of my first grade classmates went to Egypt for a summer vacation, and brought back souvenirs for our family. As a kid I began thinking on this subject, to build such pyramids that withstand all the sandstorms and all the weather conditions for centuries is amazing. Then when I moved to the US, I actually learned how to draw hieroglyphics in one of my art classes. Absolutely loved it! We have buildings that get blown away by storms, tornadoes, hurricanes, so on, so forth. Yet, despite all the extreme weather that you see in the dessert, these pyramids have withstood all this time. I find not a lot of people really discuss Egypt often. I have several friends who are from Egypt, and I have to say such a warm people. I have grown to enjoy having very honest and in-depth conversations with them. Family oriented culture, love their tea, and are very kind. Apart from the history, I also find that if anyone ever gets a chance to talk with someone with the Egyptian background, please ask as many questions as possible when it comes to the culture and history. Those who have immigrated from Egypt to the US have so much to tell. The mummies are a subject of it's own, and I might touch base on the Egyptian Book of the Dead later on, but for now I want people to just sit on what incredible history comes from there.
For this week's post I decided to write about coffee. During my undergraduate program, I took several elective courses of my own choosing. In one of the cultural courses I picked we read a book titled A History of the World in 6 Glasses written by Tom Standage. Coffee is believed to have originated from Ethiopia around the 15th century. By 16th century it spread to the Middle East, India, Persia, Turkey, and parts of Africa. "The word "coffee" entered the English language in 1582 via the Dutch koffie, borrowed from the Ottoman Turkish kahve, in turn borrowed from the Arabic qahwah" (The Irish Times). It was introduced in Europe through slavery in the 16th century. Amidst doing some more thorough research on this, I found out that coffee was brought over in various ways for each country. For example, it was first introduced by the Dutch in Indonesia in the 17th century. "After several years coffee was planted on Indonesia Archipelago. Many coffee specialties are from the Indonesian Archipelago. The colloquial name for coffee, Java, comes from the time when most of Europe and America's coffee was grown in Java. It came to Poland primarily through merchants trading with the Ottomans. The first coffeehouse in Austria opened in Vienna in 1683 after the Battle of Vienna, by using supplies from the spoils obtained after defeating the Turks."(History of coffee). It really is quite fascinating to read about each country's story. We also know that it became a major trading commodity as time passed. Coffee can also be used a median to cleanse your palate. I have had Turkish coffee before, and in comparison to other types I have tried, it is one of the strongest.
As I watched a plane fly by this week, I thought to myself about international travel, and how does traveling around the world affect your own culture? First of all, traveling anywhere will open your mind up and allow you to grow mentally, emotionally, and even spiritually as you encounter new experiences. Secondly, people are drawn to the unknown. I have an aunt who traveled to India to study yoga more thoroughly. She eventually turned to switch her careers and is now teaching psychology and healthy diet techniques. All it took was her interest in yoga and religion. You never know how one single trip might affect a person. In her case, it transformed her view on her lifestyle. It's also important to note that those who are not maybe as grounded in their own culture would be more prone to take on a new one which resonates better with them. Traveling also allows you to meet a lot of new people who can teach you so much. Whether its a simple fact, or maybe even a new language, it still changes your attitude about the world. I grew up with a few Lebanese friends, and that is how I picked up Arabic music and dances. I might have not traveled to Lebanon, but I enjoyed learning about my friends' culture, cuisine, and outlook on life, that I grew to appreciate. The food is delicious, and the music is so upbeat that you can't help but want to dance. I read once that when you travel you take a piece of you everywhere you go, and you bring a new piece of you back home once you return. I believe it is true. You create memories with people, form new friendships and partnerships, and even can learn a new skill. Overall travel helps us grow into our full potential, and sightseeing shows us what humanity is capable of.
For all of those who follow my blog, starting this week I am doing a three part series on a subject I studied in one of my cultural courses for my undergraduate degree. For the next three weeks I will be discussing three different types of sculpture structure, the different culture it comes from, its influence of how it came into existence, and the time period it is associated with. Please keep in mind, there is an overlap of architecture styles in this as well, however, I am focusing more on the sculpture aspect. To start this off, my first pick is the British culture, which has a Christian/Judaic influence. Interestingly enough, because the architecture plays such a significant role in this overlap, you will find that the styles merge between Gothic architecture and the influence of religion in structures such as Wells Cathedral. A lot of the influence came from abroad, starting in the 1730's the Roman empire played a significant role in the UK's sculpture. Britain however, took on a more conservative approach to Neoclassicism. You will find examples in a lot of public structures throughout the country. An example of this can be seen in The Death of Germanicus, eradicated i 1774, action is kept parallel to the front plane, in the tradition of the Roman antique. It wasn't until the 20th century that sculptors broke free of the norms, and took a more personal approach to carving. In 1998 the largest sculpture ever executed in Britain was unveiled—Angel of the North, created by Antony Gormley (Encyclopedia Britannica). There are a lot of other details, but the main takeaway from this particular time period and influence is the religious aspect you will find in the early sculptures.
For my second part series I am focusing on the Greek culture and a couple of sculptural styles it has brought about. During the Hellenic Age, also known as Classical Age, most of the sculpture focused on act of motion and movement, which the Greeks viewed as a way to freeze time and celebrate an ideal human body. An example of this style can be seen in Doryphoros, which means "Spearbearer," constructed in 440 BCE by Polykleitos. "The figure is squarely built and stands in a relaxed contrapposto position, weight on right leg, left hand bent backward to hold a spear shaft over his shoulder. (This came from the essay I wrote on this time era). The second type of art form dates back to the Hellenistic Period. During this time, the emphasis was still on the Greeks, but also incorporated Persian and other Mediterranean cultures. This can be viewed an in-between Greek and Roman periods. An example of this can be seen in Aphrodite of Melos, created in late third century BCE. "The statue, it is argued, was set up within the civic gymnasium of Melos. There, it was on display for everyone to not only admire but also serve as a reminder of the infamous Trojan War...not only was it appropriate for display within a gymnasium but indeed exemplifies a critical aspect of that institution's role during the Hellenistic period: the creation of a standardized and highly selective vision of the past to serve as a model for the present" (Kousser). I always found Greek culture intriguing in regards to mythology, and as you can see the Greeks had an emotional attachment to it beyond just storytelling.